Skip to main content
All CollectionsInfo for Pros
Full Feedback Guidelines
Full Feedback Guidelines

Audiu's required structure for Full Feedback

Ed avatar
Written by Ed
Updated over a week ago

Key Points

  • All four mandatory modules MUST be completed

  • You can have multiple comments of the same category

  • You can embed images, video and audio into comments

  • Ensure there are no empty comments

Mandatory Modules

First Impressions 

Thoughts and feelings on the first listen

The insight from the first impression is unique and can only be obtained once. Try and take notes either during or immediately after first listen.

Strongest Point 

Most impressive, not necessarily what stands out the most

It’s crucial to identify what the producer has done right.  If the strongest

point isn’t clear, or there are several points competing for the top spot, then that should be explained (there can be joint strongest points).

Weakest Point 

Worst aspect, not necessarily what stands out the most

A very common problem is that the producer has produced something that they’re unsatisfied with, yet they’re unable to identify what exactly isn’t quite right. This is especially

important when the track is of a very high standard because these points tend to be the ‘make or break’ points. 

Suggested Strategy

What they could do next to improve the work

This is the Pro’s chance to qualify themselves by giving practical advice, sharing techniques and solutions. This can be presented in a “I would / If it were my decision” style, or alternatively as a more direct, “You should / You could try­” style. 

Optional Modules

Completeness / Credibility

This is a consideration as to whether or not the work sounds ready to be released. In some cases a track may sound authentic and might pass as ‘complete’ despite its imperfections. It’s most important that the Pro supports their opinion with sufficient details to justify it. 

Appeal / Market

The Pro should look at the work from a business perspective, suggesting

where the work sounds like it would fit in, where appropriate. If the Pro doesn’t

personally like the track, they may at least recognise its potential for the right audience. 

Originality / Unique points

What positive aspects distinguish the recording from other works? This could relate to

quirky lyrics, any form of gimmick, or general convention ­breaking. This will often be something the producer has intentionally worked hard at, but it could also be due to their natural creative flair or a total fluke. In any case, originality should be celebrated and the most unique points need to be highlighted.

Character / Sound choices

Commonly the perceived quality of an amateur work can be significantly improved by the use of better samples, synth patches or better vocal talent. Can also discuss overall tone/personality of the track. Discuss individual sounds using this category.

Timing / Groove

For discussion of timing and groove in relation to the track/genre. Is the tempo suitable? Does it use appropriate use of swing? Is the timing sloppy at all?

Flow / Transitions

The Pro should pay special attention to the flow of energy throughout the work and, in particular, how natural it feels moving from one section to the next. Perhaps the main buildup feels limp, the drop is underwhelming, or the intro seems disjointed or goes on for longer than you’d expect.

Mixdown / Professionalism

There are many ways to judge a mixdown, but for the purposes of high quality feedback,the main value of the mixdown can be thought of as its ability to clearly carry the message of the music and to give a generally professional impression.

Be sure to also check out our top tips for giving great feedback

Did this answer your question?